Good morning.
"And the beat goes on................"
Floundering under the weight of the Russian Investigations and Probes, it was reported this weekend that the Trump Administration is assembling a WAR ROOM (borrowing a page from the Clinton Administration that, facing the Monica Lewinsky scandal, assembled lawyers, investigators and communications people to manage that White House situation). An internal War Room seeks to contain, manage and respond to the investigations, theoretically allowing the rest of the White House to continue with normal business and their legislative agenda and other projects.
A War Room is akin to a Think Tank in that you assemble experienced experts who can approach the subject from a wide variety of perspectives, do their own investigations and research and lobby for specific actions based on the consensus of their findings and their own agenda. In truth, it is an assemblage of the Generals who can fight the war to victory, then disband.
Think Tanks or Policy Institutes are independent organizations that assemble a body of experts to consider specific social, political, economic, societal or cultural issues by engaging in research and advocacy around those issues. Unlike War Rooms, they are ongoing institutions. Click here for a list and description of the Top 50 Think Tanks in America.
The most media covered Think Tank of late is the Heritage Foundation, founded in 1973, which originally gained recognition during the Reagan years, and more recently as the most influential conservative organization in the country by having its roadmap adopted in large measure by the Trump Administration as its agenda.
Other influential Think Tanks - both liberal and conservative (ranging from the Human Rights Watch, to the Council on Foreign Relations, the Urban Institute to the Economic Policy Institute) center around science, the environment, the economy, technology, war and international relations. Many are generally unknown to the public, but wield considerable power in political and government circles. Many, but not all, are affiliated with a University, and many have full time fellows and researchers working on issues under the purview of the organization. Well funded Think Tanks have full staffs, ambitious research, communications teams and substantial outreach to decision makers and to the media. Over time they gain prestige and are seen as authoritative sources of information.
Two or three (The Rand Corporation, The Aspen Institute, The Urban Institute) have, from time to time, taken up studies, research and positions on Arts and Culture topics, but these have been isolated, occasional forays. There is no Think Tank that has as its principal charge the Arts, Humanities, Creativity, Culture, Heritage and other facets and divisions of the wider field of culture and creativity.
Why not?
Given the disparity between what the public says about arts and culture and their actions, given the repeated and regular attacks on the Arts, given both the suggested and proven value of the arts on multiple levels and given the extent to which the arts and creativity are a major facet of the American job market and economy, one would think the many disciplines under the banner of Arts and Culture would be a prime area for the formation of a Think Tank dedicated to the study and consideration of the field.
There are a number of University programs that focus on various aspects of the Arts and Arts Administration - but for the most part these are student oriented degree programs, and not Think Tanks per se. And there are a number of national arts service organizations that have programs and events that are almost mini abbreviated Think Tanks - but again transitory and without portfolio or faculty. And, to be sure, there is now widespread, independent, robust and rigorous research being conducted on a global basis on Arts, Culture, Creativity and the attendant subjects thereto.
But no real Arts and Culture Think Tank. No organization with the authority, prestige and cache of an established Think Tank. And we could use something like that. Such an institution could play a role in protecting and sustaining the knowledge base of our most accomplished and experienced leadership as they retire. It could also play a role in the mentoring and preparation of future generations of leadership. And it could launch and sustain deep conversations about issues that impact all of us. Finally, it could command media interest and attention so that the field isn't ignored.
The principal reason we don't have an Arts Think Tank is very likely no funder has ever considered the seed funding to start one. And that is usually what it takes to launch this kind of ongoing effort. We have within our ranks the experts - with prestigious qualifications and degrees. We have the basis of the research apparatus. We know the issues. We have the need.
Maybe the time has come for a consortium of funders to consider the establishment of a legitimate Arts and Culture Think Tank (The Arts and Culture Institute), affiliated with a University somewhere, and which could provide an umbrella for research, advocacy, dialogue, inquiry and discussion of Arts and Culture in America. And help unite all the many disparate conversations that are already going on.
I'm not the only one over the past decade who thinks this might be of enormous value to our field. Maybe some smart people might put together a proposal and seek funding.
Have a good week.
Don't Quit
Barry
